Showing posts with label ACTION-ALERTS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ACTION-ALERTS. Show all posts

12/11/07

FLOOD CAPITOL HILL (WITH PHONE CALLS) TONITE




Action Alert from Beyond Nuclear

December 11, 2007

Urge Congress to Block Nuclear Loan Guarantees

Please Call Right Away!

Last week we celebrated when U.S. Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) was forced to withdraw his unlimited federal loan guarantees for new atomic reactors from the energy bill. This week – maybe as soon as today – we have a new fight on our hands.

As early as tonight, December 11, on the House floor, a similar provision could be voted on in the energy & water appropriations bill. It could go to the Senate floor tomorrow. After his failure to push this boondoggle through the energy bill, Domenici is now "just asking" his appropriations committee colleagues in the House and Senate for approval of the first $25 billion in nuclear loan guarantees for Fiscal Year 2008. The energy and water appropriations bill will almost certainly be folded into the omnibus appropriations bill, making it even more difficult to extricate the nuclear loan guarantees.

All of this is going on behind closed doors. But we must expect the worst so please keep making those phone calls!

Please immediately call the chairmen of the House and Senate appropriations committees, as well as the chairmen of the House and Senate energy and water development appropriations subcommittees, and urge them to strip the $25 billion in nuclear loan guarantees from their imminent FY08 spending bills:

House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey (D-WI), (202) 225-2771

House Energy and Water Development Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Peter Visclosky (D-IN), (202) 225-3421

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd (D-WV), (202) 224-7363

Senate Energy and Water Development Subcommittee Chairman Byron Dorgan (D-ND), (202) 224-8119.

Also, please call your two U.S. senators and your U.S. representative immediately, and urge them to do all they can to block the $25 billion in nuclear loan guarantees for fiscal year 2008, no matter what bill it's attached to.

This may be our last chance to stop these massive nuclear loan guarantees from being enacted. We blocked them in the energy bill, now we need to block them in the appropriations bill!

We need to flood Capitol Hill with phone calls. Call your senators and representatives via the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.


Urge them to speak with their party leaders, as well as the leaders of the appropriations committees and energy and water appropriations subcommittees, and to express their opposition to these gigantic nuclear loan guarantees.

Please pass this on! Send this alert to as many of your family and friends as you can and urge them to do the same. We don’t need risky new nuclear reactors at all, but especially not if all the financial liability is heaped onto the backs of the American taxpayers!

Thank you. Without your calls we wouldn’t have won the first time. Now we have to ensure that lightning really can strike twice. Let’s knock out these loan guarantees permanently. Together we have the power!

Kevin Kamps, Radioactive Waste Watchdog
Beyond Nuclear
6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 400
Takoma Park, MD 20912
Office phone: (301) 270-2209, Cell phone: (240) 462-3216, Fax: (301) 270-400

Read More......

Obama , Nuclear and free speech...



From: deb@nukebusters.org
> To: can@nukebusters.org
> Subject: the way obama works.
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> Obama...GNEP (spent fuel dumping & reprocessing) & lack of freedom of
> speech...
>
> We wanted to let you know how the Obama campaign treats people concerned
> about his position on GNEP and nuclear issues...
>
> At the big Obama-Oprah rally here in Columbia, South Carolina on Sunday,
> a few of us decided to hold up signs at the entrance to the venue
> (university football stadium) against Obama's support of research into
> GNEP. You may have noticed at the Democratic debate two weeks ago in Las
> Vegas that he said he supported nuclear power and that Argonne lab in
> Illinois was conducting promising research on how to manage nuclear
> waste (uh, GNEP that is). If GNEP goes forward, South Carolina (Savannah
> River Site & the old Barnwell reprocessing plant) is perhaps the main
> site being considered to receive the nation's spent nuclear fuel.
>
> When we arrived at the stadium entrance with a few posterboard signs the
> Obama people were all over us, trying to kick us off the property. They
> said we could go to the "free speech" area that was several blocks away.
> Hm...sure sounds like a tactic of a certain president who could care
> less about free speech. We didn't leave and they got the police to come,
> who forced us off the property and to the sidewalk across the street
> (where people entering the stadium could still see us). The stadium,
> they said, was rented by the Obama campaign and it was not a public area
> any more. Hunh?! One of us returned to the stadium property with a sign
> and a police officer pursued her and shoved her in the back, making sure
> to be out of camera range.
>
> So, we wanted to let you know about these tactics of the Obama campaign
> to stifle free speech. Is the campaign really about the change it
> claims? The reaction was shocking and unanticipated by us. If anyone has
> heard of his campaign applying this tactic at others sites please let us
> know. And, if anyone has heard him say more about GNEP and reprocessing
> please pass it on. And, how much money is he taking from the nuclear
> industry (while claiming to take no money from special interests)?? And
> Oprah, is she also pro-GNEP and anti-free speech? Say it ain't so!
>
> Regards,
>
> Tom Clements
> Leslie Minerd
> Elaine Cooper
> (now headed to the Obama offcie to talk about this.,..if you don't hear
> from us again se

Read More......

11/29/07

Will Congress make taxpayers fund terror-target nuke reactors?

November 29, 2007
Harvey Wasserman.

Within a matter of days Congressional back-room deals may rubber stamp huge taxpayer loan guarantees to build dozens of what amount to pre-deployed "dirty bombs" for terrorists.

The terror attacks of September 11, 2001, showed that atomic power plants are supremely vulnerable. The first jet that hit the World Trade Center flew directly over Indian Point, whose two active reactors---plus one more that's retired---sit next to some very fragile high-level waste storage pools.

Had that first jet hit Indian Point, 35 miles north of Manhattan, with tens of millions of Americans closely downwind, the devastation would have been unimaginable. In fact, the 9/11 Commission found that Al Quaeda at one point considered crashing two planes into two nuclear facilities as part of its original plan.

Yet Senator Pete Domenici (R-NM) is trying desperately to force taxpayers to underwrite $50 billion and more in loans to build still more of these radioactive bulls-eyes. A decision to include these provisions in the Energy Bill may be made as you read this, which is why safe energy advocates are asking citizens to flood Congress with calls, demanding the provisions be removed.

There is effectively nothing that can protect an atomic power plant from a terror attack. After 9/11, a global internet debate erupted over whether a jet could penetrate a reactor containment dome. Fortunately, there is no experimental data…yet.

But at very least more than two dozen early reactor domes, including Indian Point's, were never required to withstand a jet crash. They were designed in the 1960s with no anticipation of the much bigger planes now filling our skies. There is nothing to indicate they could withstand the kind of impact or fire that hit the WTC towers.

It would not be necessary for terrorists to hijack another jet, since Osama bin Laden among others has more than enough money to buy his own.

Nor would they need to penetrate a containment. The impact and fire alone on or near a reactor could devastate pipes, pumps, cooling systems, electronic controls, human operators, off-site power and communications, and any number of additional vital pressure points capable of causing a melt-down.

Chernobyl did explode in 1986, and Michigan's Fermi I fast breeder almost did so in 1966. In 1979, Three Mile Island faced the possibility of a hydrogen explosion. But its lethal radiation, which killed people and animals nearby, vented through stacks that remained intact throughout the disaster.

Arizona's entire three-reactor Palo Verde complex was recently shut because a single worker had what may have been a pipe bomb in his car.

All these events highlight the vulnerability of any society dependent on nuke power for its energy. A recent earthquake in Japan forced shut seven reactors in a single moment. The US now has 104 such plants generating some 20% of our electricity. Many are also near earthquake faults. All are vulnerable individually and as a fleet to a terror shut-down without a moment's notice.

Domenici's loan plan has been denounced by nearly every major environmental group in the United States, along with taxpayer groups and free marketeers such as the Cato Institute and Forbes Magazine, plus Congressional conservatives concerned about the budget process.

Domenici and his neo-con cohorts have been clear in their willingness to shred the Constitution in the name of national security.

But they would simultaneously force us to underwrite easily ignitable engines of radioactive mass destruction pre-deployed on our own soil.

The decision on whether these radioactive loan guarantees will be in the Energy Bill is being made as you read this. Call the Congressional leadership, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and tell them these bailouts for terror-target nukes must be stopped. NOW!!

--
Harvey Wasserman edits www.nukefree.org, where you can sign the petition against these guarantees. He is also senior editor of www.freepress.org, and his Solartopia: Our Green-Powered Earth, AD 2030 is available via www.solartopia.org.




Read More......

11/11/07

Increased elevated cancer rates in New York, Connecticut and New Jersey


PHASE RRHP
Public Health and Sustainable Energy Radiation & Public Health Project
21 Perlman Drive 716 Simpson Ave.
Spring Valley, NY 10977 Ocean City, NJ 08226
(845) 371-2100 (609) 399-4343
palisadesart@aol.com www.radiation.org
odiejoe@aol.com

PRESS CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT
For Immediate Release

Contact:
Joseph Mangano 484-948-7965 (cell), 609-399-4343 (office)
Susan Shapiro (845) 596-5403 (cell), (845) 371-2100 (office)


CHRISTIE BRINKLEY and ALEC BALDWIN, LOCAL GROUPS TO ANNOUNCE ALARMING NEW ALLEGATIONS OF HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS CAUSED BY THE INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR REACTORS

Increased elevated cancer rates in New York, Connecticut and New Jersey, new evidence of radioactive material leaking from the reactors, declining safety margins, and important new contentions opposing the 20 year license renewal at the troubled Indian Point Nuclear reactors which are leaking strontium 90, tritium and cesium 137 into the Hudson River, will be detailed at a press conference on November 12, 2007, 11:30 a.m. in Room 4102 (4th Floor) at City University of New York Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue (corner of 34th Street).

SPEAKERS AND INVITED GUESTS:

Congressman Eliot Engel
Christie Brinkley, celebrity spokesperson and community activist
Alec Baldwin, star of hit series 30 ROCK and community activist
Joseph Mangano MPH MBA, Radiation and Public Health Project
Susan Shapiro JD, (Public Health and Sustainable Energy)
Connie Coker, Rockland County Legislator
Annie Wilson, Sierra Club New York Chapter

WHEN:

November 12, 2007 at 11:30 a.m.

WHERE:

City University of New York Graduate Center
365 Fifth Avenue (corner of 34th Street), Room 4102 (4th Floor)
New York, NY

BACKGROUND:

Entergy Nuclear has requested that federal regulators extend the license of the Indian Point 2 and 3 nuclear reactors in Westchester County, NY, for and additional 20 years beyond their license expirations of 2013 and 2015. To date, neither Entergy nor federal regulators have acknowledged the grave threat to public health posed by these aging nuclear reactors, and that risk increases with each day the aging reactors remain in service.

RPHP and PHASE will be laying out a plan aimed at raising public awareness, and giving citizens of Connecticut, New Jersey and New York the information they need to make intelligent decisions about the continued operation of Entergy's Indian Point nuclear reactors in Buchanan, New York, just 24 miles up river from the heart of New York City. In the post 9/11 world, “Are the health and safety risks of having Indian Point as our neighbor for 20 more years a gamble we can or want to take?”

News conference subjects of note:

1) Release of Radiation and the Public Health Project report on cancer rates near the Indian Point nuclear plant, with time for questions on the report.

2) Information on the PHASE, Radiation and Public Health Project co-sponsored campaign to educate local residents and leaders on the Environmental, Health and Safety risks associated with the proposed 20 year license renewal of the Indian Point reactors.

3) PHASE will be discussing their latest intervener petitions to stop relicensing of Indian Point due to impacts on human health and safety.


4) PHASE will be announcing various dates and locations where they will be collecting signatures to on Intervener Petitions to stop relicensing of Indian Point.

Radiation and Public Health Project (www.radiation.org) is a nonprofit educational and scientific organization, established in 1995 by scientists and physicians dedicated to understanding the relationships between low-level, nuclear radiation and public health. Members of the organization have published 22 medical journal articles and 5 books since 1994 on health risks of nuclear reactors. RPHP is conducting the only study of in-body radiation near U.S. nuclear plants, an analysis of Strontium-90 levels in nearly 5,000 baby teeth, of which over 500 are from the New York metropolitan area

Public Health and Sustainable Energy, is a grassroots, not-for-profit think tank, advocating the development and use of sustainable energy, in an effort to protect public health and safety and to preserve the integrity of our environment. Recently reorganization it, has made headlines recently for its intervention petition to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding the re-licensing of Indian Point.

SUPPORTED BY:
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater (Clearwater)
Citizens Activation Network (CAN)
Sierra Club - New York Chapter




Read More......

11/6/07

PSA Defenders of the Black Hills


From: C WHITE FACE
To: Harold One Feather ; Harold One Feather
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 12:36:44 PM
Subject: PSADefenders of the Black Hills
P. O. Box 2003, Rapid City, SD 57709 Nov. 6, 2007 Public Service Announcement

“Public Meeting about Abandoned Uranium Mines in the Cave Hills Area”

On Tues. Nov. 13, 2007, the US Forest Service will hold a meeting in Ludlow regarding the abandoned uranium mines in the Cave Hills area at Riley Pass. The meeting is for the public and will be held in the Ludlow Hall from 5-8:00 PM.

Representatives from Tronox, formerly Kerr-McGee, the mining company that dug the uranium mine at Riley Pass will be there as well as representatives from SD School of Mines and Technology.

We encourage as many people as possible to attend and question how and when all of the 89 mines are going to be cleaned up, the health concerns from no cleanup after 30 years of leaving the mines exposed, possible destruction of more burial and sacred sites in the cleanup process, and how much taxpayer dollars are being used for the cleanup.

For more information call (605) 399-1868, or email: bhdefenders@msn.com



Read More......

Petition for KEY SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PROVISIONS



From: kbossong614@yahoo.com
Subject: SIGN-ONS INVITED: Letter to Congress. re. Energy Bill + Sustainable Energy Provisions
Date: November 6, 2007 4:02:18 PM EST
To: kbossong614@yahoo.com

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY NETWORK
8606 Greenwood Avenue, #2
Takoma Park, MD 20912
301-588-4741
sustainable-energy-network@hotmail.com November 6, 2007
To: Members, Sustainable Energy Network + Other Interested
Organizations/Individuals From: Ken Bossong

Below please find a letter to the Members of the U.S. Senate and U.S.
House of Representatives urging that stronger CAFE standards, a renewable
electricity standard, and extension of renewable energy tax credits be
included in any energy bill that is enacted.

If you would like to sign on your organization or business, please
provide:

ORGANIZATION NAME
YOUR NAME & TITLE
CITY, STATE

If you would like to sign the letter as an INDIVIDUAL, please clearly
indicate as such and provide:

YOUR NAME
CITY, STATE

If you are signing as an individual but would like to include a title or
organizational affiliation "for identification purposes only" please
provide that information as well.

The letter will be faxed on Tuesday - November 13 to the Members of the
leadership of both the House and the Senate as well as to the Members of
key congressional committees. A pro forma news release will also be
issued.

SIGN-ON DEADLINE: If you wish to sign this letter, please let us know by
no later than MIDNIGHT - MONDAY, NOVEMBER 12.

Thank you.

P.S. Please accept our apologies if you receive more than one copy of
this message - we are using several overlapping mailing lists.

==================================

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY NETWORK
8606 Greenwood Avenue, #2
Takoma Park, MD 20912
301-588-4741
sustainable-energy-network@hotmail.com


November 13, 2007

PLEASE SUPPORT THESE KEY SUSTAINABLE ENERGY PROVISIONS IN PENDING ENERGY
LEGISLATION


U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC

attn: Energy Policy Staff Members

Dear Senator, Representative:

We the xx undersigned businesses, organizations, and individuals are
writing to urge that national energy legislation now under consideration
include a broad range of measures to aggressively promote renewable energy
technologies and improved energy efficiency.

The rapidly worsening threat of global climate change, the economic and
national security risks posed by rising oil prices and energy imports, and
the on-going environmental and safety concerns associated with nuclear
power all call for increased national support for sustainable energy
policies.

At the least, the following provisions should be included in any energy
legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress.

AUTOMOBILE FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS:

First, fuel efficiency standards for cars and light trucks must be
substantially improved. The U.S. Senate's energy bill calls for a
standard of 35 mpg by 2020. This is well below what has been technically
and economically achievable for many years and falls far short of what
will ultimately be needed.

For example, studies suggest that using hybrid technologies, the fuel
economy level could be raised to 55 miles per gallon and with fuel cell
technologies, they could approach 80 miles per gallon.

Nonetheless, the target set by the Senate bill represents a significant
improvement over the current fleet-wide average of approximately 25 mpg
and should be supported as a positive first step.

NATIONAL RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY STANDARD:

Second, a minimum national standard should be set for producing
electricity from renewable energy sources. The House energy bill calls
for a standard of 15 percent of the country's electricity to come from
renewable sources by 2020. At best, this should be viewed as a minimal
goal.

Already 25 states plus the District of Columbia have approved renewable
electricity requirements with many setting targets far more aggressive
than the proposed federal standard. For example, California is seeking
20% by 2010 while Minnesota, Hawaii, and Colorado are mandating 20% by
2020. Internationally, even more aggressive standards have been set by
the member nations of the European Union; Germany is now aiming for
getting 27 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2020 and at least
45 percent by 2030.

Ideally, a renewable electricity standard should be designed to support
and promote the environmentally-responsible deployment of the full
portfolio of renewable energy technologies including solar, wind,
geothermal, biomass, and water power. A federal standard also might be
flexible and include energy efficiency - as provided for in the House bill
and already in place in Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

To the extent that the House approach sets a lower-than-necessary standard
and may not promote the full spectrum of sustainable energy technologies,
it could be improved. Nonetheless, it is a positive step that should be
supported.

RENEWABLE ENERGY TAX INCENTIVES:

Third, any national energy legislation should extend and expand existing
renewable energy tax incentives, particularly the production tax credit
for renewable power plants, Clean Renewable Energy Bonds, and the
investment tax credits for commercial and residential solar and fuel cell
technologies. These tax incentives are vital to ensure continued, dynamic
growth in the production of electricity using renewable energy resources
and should be given longer-term extensions (e.g., eight years).

The existing mix of tax incentives - many of which are scheduled to expire
by the end of 2008 - really should be seen as only a beginning in the
shift in federal funding away from fossil fuels and nuclear power to
sustainable energy technologies. Extension of existing sustainable energy
tax incentives is an absolutely necessary, but only initial, step in that
process.

A national energy strategy that truly addresses the multiple challenges
posed by climate change, energy imports, rising oil prices, and nuclear
safety will necessarily need to be far more comprehensive than suggested
by these initial measures. Moreover, we believe that energy initiatives
far more aggressive than those now under consideration will need to be
acted upon by the U.S. Congress in the very near future.

Nonetheless, these preliminary actions would represent steps in the right
direction and accordingly we urge your support for measures to improve
automobile fuel efficiency, to set minimum national standards for
electricity production from renewable energy sources, and to extend the
tax incentives needed to expand the nation's renewable energy industries.

We appreciate your attention to these views.

Sincerely,






Read More......

11/1/07

Pills for spills



Please sign onto the FUSE letter supporting the continued distribution of KI within 20 miles of a nuclear facilitiy.

To sign on please email me you name and address. Thanks.
Susan Shapiro
FUSE USA
21 Perlman Drive
Spring Valley, NY 10977
(845) 371-2100


Dr. John Marburger, III
Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Executive Office of the President
New Executive Office Bldg.,
Washington D.C. 20502
Fax 202-456-6021
Attn: Dawn at depperson@ostp.eop.gov

November 1, 2007


RE: Bioterroism Act Section 127- Stockpiling Potassium Iodine (KI) for residents living 20 miles from a nuclear reactor site.

Dear Dr. Marburger:

The following comments are submitted on behalf of FUSE USA, state and local public interest groups, and individuals living within 20 miles of the Indian Point reactors that are leaking tritium, strontium 90 and cesium 137 into the environment urging implementation of the Bioterrorism Act's Section 127 - stockpiling Potassium Iodine (KI) for residents living 20 miles from a nuclear reactor site.

Because NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute) has lobbied that distribution of KI causes PR problems for the industry during their push for a Nuclear Renaissance, the nuclear industry, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Administration are wrongfully attempting to block the pre-distribution of Potassium Iodide (KI) in the 20 mile radius surrounding a reactor site.

FUSE USA, and the below co-signer, s herein implore you to place the public's interest, human health and safety first in this important matter and support the implementation of the Bioterrorism Act's Section 127.

We understand and deeply regret that President Bush has cold heartedly moved to nullify Section 127 of the 2002 Bioterrorism Act law that would greatly improve protection for the public in case of nuclear Terrorism or in the case of a significant fast moving event at aging plants like Entergy's Indian Point. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the nuclear power industry fought the legislation; however it passed almost unanimously and was signed into law by a Pro-Nuclear president. The White House hailed the result, declaring that henceforth, this "crucial" drug would be available where and when needed in a a fast moving emergency.

More than five years after the law's passage the broader distribution of KI has yet to take place due to the NRC's foot dragging maneuvers that are being driven by heavy lobbying from NEI and reactor owners. By doing this the nuclear industry is not adequately protecting our children and our families, and placing reactor communities at risk should a terrorist attack or radiological event occur at the Indian Point Nuclear reactors located just 24 miles up the Hudson River from Manhattan.

The Department of Health and Human Services, who had initial authority over the statute, tried to make the bill a reality; however, it has been frustrated by the NRC, working behind the scenes with the White House staff who view the distribution of K1 an inconvenient truth at a time when they were/are trying to force a Nuclear Renaissance on America and are engaged in unprecedented Propaganda campaign. Please note that the NRC Staff involved in this unethical blocking of K1 distribution are not medical doctors.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has found that “the effectiveness of KI as a specific blocker of thyroid radioiodine uptake is well established (Il'in LA, et al., 1972) as are the doses necessary for blocking uptake. As such, it is reasonable to conclude that KI will likewise be effective in reducing the risk of thyroid cancer in individuals or populations at risk for inhalation or ingestion of radionuclides”.

The NRC's argument against the guidelines are based on a provision of the statute that permits the President to forgo expanded KI stockpiling if he identifies a more effective alternative means of thyroid protection. It is noted here that the President has not offered up a viable workable alternative for thyroid protection.

KI is recommended to prevent thyroid cancer in the event of a radiological incident by: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; World Health Organization; American Thyroid Association; American Academy of Pediatrics; International Agency Atomic Scientists; National Academy of Sciences; National Council on Radiation Protection; Federation of American Physics; Physicians for Social Responsibility; Union of Concerned Scientists; and locally for example the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS) July 22, 2002 adopted a policy which calls for providing thyroid-blocking agents to all Massachusetts communities for protection against radioiodine. Further we know that nations around the world have routinely stockpiled potassium iodide for many years

Placing public health and safety at risk to support the Nuclear Industry, is unconscionable. Especially since the costs of KI is minimal, the tablets are only pennies. Whereas, thyroid cancer surgery and cures cost hundred of thousands of dollars and the loss of human life.

President Bush has signed an order stripping HHS of its responsibilities for KI under the law and transferring said responsibility to an under-staffed and overworked

There is a need to stockpile KI beyond 10-miles, as appreciated by Congress and by NRC in their own studies:.

1. Federal studies indicate that the consequences of an accident can spread well beyond 10-miles. Calculation of Reactor Accident Consequences U.S. Nuclear Power Plants (CRAC-II), Sandia National Laboratory, 1982 states: The consequences of a core melt at Pilgrim NPS, for example, would result in a 20 miles peak 1st year fatal radius; a 65 miles peak 1st year injury radius; and 23,000 peak cancer deaths. These estimates are conservative.

2. NRC's site specific consequence plume models are inaccurate because they use a steady- state straight-line Gaussian plume distribution model when instead variable trajectory models are needed due to the complexity of winds at reactor sites resulting from the sea-breeze or lake effect and wind variability resulting from hills, river valleys, and building clusters. Use of the appropriate variable trajectory models would demonstrate that plumes and consequences extend further than currently projected, thereby justifying KI distribution beyond 10 miles.

3. The reason to provide KI in the 10-20 mile zone is because of the possibility of inhalation during an accident of significant consequence. For example, Dr. Temeck (FDA representative to NRC's KI Core Group Meeting, Tempe Arizona, March 4, 1999) stated that exposure to children after Chernobyl resulted from “a combination of inhalation and ingestion.”

4. NRC's NUREG-1633 points out that radioactive iodide can travel hundreds of miles on the winds. An increase in cancer caused by Chernobyl was detected in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Notably, this increase, seen in areas more that 150 miles from the site, continues to this day and primarily affects children who were 0-14 years old at the time of the accident. The vast majority of the thyroid cancers were diagnosed among those living more than 31 miles from the site. The 2001 figures showed 11,000 thyroid cancers at 31 miles.

Despite the above studies, for decades The NRC has opposed the enactment of Section 127; NRC staff consistently has opposed stockpiling potassium iodide and has provided misinformation to other Government agencies regarding KI.

Therefore, the Congress in the Bioterrorism Act directed authority to the National Academy of Sciences and to HHS for assessment and implementation

On November 1, 2005, William F. Kane, Deputy Executive Director for Reactor and Preparedness Programs, sent a letter to Dr. Robert Claypool of the Department of Health and Human Service, which seriously distorted the findings of the report on KI issued in 2004 by the National Research Council of the National Academies of Science (NAS). The NRC letter quoted one sentence from the NAS report, from page 159, while omitting the four preceding sentences to “raise questions regarding the usefulness of expanded distribution of KI," as the NRC letter claims.

However, the NAS reported clearly states that,
"In the event of nuclear accidents or as a result of nuclear terrorism, radioiodine could be released to the environment. Because iodine concentrates in the thyroid gland, exposure to radioiodine by inhalation of contaminated air or ingestion of contaminated milk and other foods can lead to radiation injury to the thyroid, including risk of thyroid cancer and
other thyroid diseases. Thyroid radiation exposure from radioiodine can be limited by taking stable iodine. KI is a chemical compound that contains iodine and can be used to protect the thyroid gland from possible radiation injury by reducing the amount of radioiodine concentrated by the thyroid after inhalation of radioiodine. KI is also effective for protection against the harmful thyroid effects of radioiodine ingested in contaminated milk and other food, but food testing and interdiction programs in place throughout the United States are more effective preventive strategies for ingestion pathways."

The NAS report made clear that depending on site-specific factors, KI might be desirable beyond the 10-mile EPZ, since the 10-mile radius does not necessarily correspond to the actual risk presented. See Recommendation 2, from p. 160, of the section on "Benefits of and Risks Posed by Potassium Iodide Distribution":

"KI distribution should be included in the planning for comprehensive radiological incident response programs for nuclear power plants. KI distribution programs should consider pre-distribution, local stockpiling outside the emergency planning zone (EPZ), and national stockpiles and distribution capacity." [Boldface in the original.]

In the summer of 1998, NRC Commissioners, after authorizing publication of "NUREG-1633," a staff analysis of KI, ordered it withdrawn from circulation after scathing comments from state health officials alerted the Commissioners to its numerous misstatements and distortions. This NRC document, 40 pages long, managed not to mention the FDA's finding that KI was "safe and effective."

A member of NRC staff has been quoted as saying, “distribution of the pills does NOT LOOK GOOD FOR THE INDUSTRY.” It is unacceptable for public health decisions to based on a Nuclear Renaissance Propaganda Campaign.

One of the key lessons learned from Katrina is that we as a nation must be prepared and have a plan already in place to protect human health, public safety, and the environment. The government's dismal response to Hurricane Katrina has become a major embarrassment to the Administration, and a tragedy for American citizens.

Accidents can happen due to mechanical failure, human error or acts of malice, and that the government's response may not be adequate or timely. The reactor communities living within 20 miles of America's fleet of 104 aging nuclear reactors with known safety issues, and aging problems, such as reactor vessel thermal shock and risk of pipe burst caused by Flow Accelerated Corrosion (FAC), must be adequately protected by proactively distributing KI to reactor communities within 20 miles of nuclear facilities. It is imperative that the recommendation of health experts are followed.

In a nuclear accident or terrorist attack, radioactive iodine will be released; will be absorbed by the human thyroid; and in sufficient quantity will cause thyroid cancer, thyroid disease and/or growth disorders in those exposed-especially the unborn and children, our most important and vulnerable citizens. This risk can be mitigated or prevented by taking a potassium iodide tablet - an over-the-counter FDA approved and
recommended substance - before or shortly after exposure. Because it is time dependent, KI must be proactively, stockpiled in reactor communities, so it will be available, if and when needed.

FUSE USA implores you, Dr. Marburger, to please stop President Bush from flip-flop on this issue which is so important to the public health and safety of millions of Americans living within the EPZ for American's 104 nuclear reactors.

We beseech you to impress on President Bush how important it is that he continue to support distribution of KI to 20 miles surrounding nuclear facilities; following the mandate of the 2002 Congress, and advice of America's top scientists, medical professionals in order to protect American public health and safety.


Respectfully,



Susan Shapiro
FUSE USA, President
21 Perlman Drive
Spring Valley, NY 10977

Sherwood Martinelli
FUSE USA, Vice President
351 Dyckman Street
Peekskill, New York 10566

Maureen Ritter
36 Campbell Ave.
Suffern, NY 10901




Read More......

10/22/07

NATIONAL CALL-CONGRESS DAY: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007




NATIONAL CALL-CONGRESS DAY: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007
On Tuesday, October 23, Bonnie Raitt, Jackson Browne, Graham Nash and others are coming to Washington, DC to bring added attention to the issue of stopping $50 Billion in taxpayer loan guarantees for construction of new atomic reactors. Their message will be: no taxpayer bailouts for the nuclear power industry.We hope you’ll support their efforts by calling your own Congressmembers on Tuesday, October 23, and asking your friends and colleagues to call as well. Let’s keep the halls of Capitol Hill buzzing next Tuesday—with personal visits and thousands of ringing phones! Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121. More info is available at www.nukefree.org. and if you haven’t already, please sign the petition there on loan guarantees.


Read More......

10/18/07

License extension in offing for Seabrook Station

Fosters Sunday Citizen
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Well, not imminently, but that got your attention... at least they got some critical comment from Sandy at C-10 (and tried to call SAPL). There's another article below from the same paper that includes some polling data and good comment from Gov. Lynch and our congresswoman. Anyone want to comment/send in a letter?
Fosters Sunday Citizen
Sunday, October 14, 2007

Read More......

NUKES ARE BACK SO ARE WE !



Thu Oct 18 2007
Columns
Harvey Wasserman Nukes are back and so are we
October 18, 2007

The nuclear power industry is back to where it always goes when it wants to build new reactors---the taxpayer trough.

And those of us who've been fighting them for decades are doing it again, now with help from the musicians' community, and a petition drive (at nukefree.org) aimed at stripping the radioactive subsidies from the national Energy Bill now before Congress.

Time after time over the past half-century, the atomic energy industry has gone to the government to demand massive amounts of money. The most recent public gouging came during the Great Deregulation Scam of 1999-2001. As Enron and its cronies contrived phony energy shortages and nearly bankrupted California, the atomic pushers went before America's state legislatures and asked for a massive bailout. They complained that with the coming age of deregulation (about two dozen states deregulated their electricity businesses) nuclear power plants were too expensive, inefficient and obsolete to compete in the coming green age.

So they demanded---and got---more than $100 billion in “stranded cost” payouts. These were the ultimate admission that atomic power simply could not make it in the marketplace. As deregulation failed throughout the US, what Forbes Magazine labeled “the largest managerial disaster in business history” stayed alive as America's ultimate welfare cheat.

Now the industry is back for more. After complaining about its old reactors' lousy economic performance, it now argues that the new ones will be magically transformed, and that billions more should be spent building them.

The first of those is already under construction in Finland. Ground was broken just two years ago, but the project is already two years behind schedule and $2 billion over budget.

So a whole new cover story has been invented: nuke power will “solve global warming.”

The assertion is absurd. All reactors emit radioactive carbon, along with numerous other “hot” isotopes. Massive quantities of greenhouse gasses are spewed into the atmosphere during the mining, milling and enrichment of uranium fuel. The reactors themselves emit huge plumes of heat directly into the air and water.

Nukes perform poorly in hot weather, which is precisely when they're supposed to help with global warming. Reactors in both France and the US have been forced to shut because the rivers into which they dump their waste heat have exceeded 90 degrees Farenheit.

Still more greenhouse gasses have been created with the partial construction of the proposed Yucca Mountain waste dump in Nevada, which has already cost the public $11 billion. If it ever opens---it's not yet licensed, and many say it will never be---Yucca could cost $60 to $100 billion. Even then it couldn't handle the waste from the new reactors the industry wants to build---or even all the spent fuel from the old ones now in existence.

Yet the industry wants Congress to give the industry essentially a blank check for loan guarantees to the tune of $25 billion in 2008 and $25 billion more in 2009, with countless billions more still to come down the road.

Why? Because Wall Street just isn't buying. After fifty years, nuke power is the most expensive technological failure in US history. It can't get investors, liability insurance or a solution to its waste problem. It can't compete with new conservation, efficiency or renewables like wind power.

Since 9/11/2001, it's also become obvious that atomic reactors cannot be defended from terror attack. They are pre-deployed weapons of radioactive mass destruction.

It's thus no accident that the push for new nukes with federal loan guarantees also comes with a demand for extended federal liability insurance. Who would invest in a reactor that might irradiate thousands of square miles and kill hundreds of thousands of human beings? The answer is simple: after fifty years, without federal guarantees---nobody!

Three Mile Island and Chernobyl were tragic warnings, as was the fact that the first jet to hit the World Trade Center flew directily over the Indian Point reactor complex, 45 miles north. Had those reactors been hit, the death toll could have been in the tens of thousands by now. The property damage from irradiating southern New York, Long Island, and all of downwind New Jersey and New England would be beyond calculation.

Despite all that, Pete Domenici, the Senator from Nuke Power, slipped these loan guarantees into the 2007 Energy Bill that could become one of the most expensive and lethal rip-offs in US history.

Meanwhile, the renewable energy industry is soaring to new heights of power and profitability. Wind farming has boomed to a $10-15 billion per year industry, with worldwide growth rates surpassing 25%. Breakthroughs in silicon solar cells are taking rooftop photovoltaics (PV) to vastly increased levels of efficiency and profitability. Bio-fuels, tidal, geo- and ocean thermal, wave energy and many more rapidly developing forms of green power are also booming ahead.

In 1979, Bonnie Raitt, Jackson Browne and Graham Nash, through Musicians United for Safe Energy, helped organize five nights of No Nukes concerts at Madison Square Garden. The accompanying rally at Battery Park City drew 200,000 people.

All of it was part of a successful grassroots campaign to stop the nuke industry. In 1974 Richard Nixon predicted there would be 1000 reactors in the US by the year 2000. But in the year 2000, there were just 103.

That's still 103 too many. Browne, Nash and Raitt are now working to help stop this latest bailout. In singing Stephen Stills's classic “For What It's Worth,” they joined Ben Harper and Keb Mo for a video that's linked through the www.nukefree.org web site, where a petition is being circulated and signed.

On October 23 they'll present the first round of petitions to Congress. In demanding the nuke subsidies be removed from an Energy Bill that contains many positive green features, they'll be joined by their fellow musician John Hall (D-NY), now a US Representative committed to shutting Indian Point.

They'll also be working with one of the most successful non-violent grassroots campaigns in US history. Should they stop this latest atomic assault on the public treasury, the door could finally open for a truly green-powered future.

--
Harvey Wasserman, a co-founder of Musicians United for Safe Energy, is editing the nukefree.org web site. His SOLARTOPIA! Our Green-Powered Earth, A.D. 2030, is at www.solartopia.org.




Read More......

10/17/07

HELP STOP $50 BILLION FOR NEW NUCLEAR REACTORS!



October 17, 2007

HELP STOP $50 BILLION FOR NEW NUCLEAR REACTORS!

SUPPORT MUSICIANS AND OTHERS WORKING TO STOP AN ATOMIC BAILOUT!

NATIONAL CALL-CONGRESS DAY: TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2007

Plus: Sign-On Letter, New Factsheets, Read on…..

Dear Friends:

It’s time to make our most visible statement yet to stop some $50 Billion in taxpayer loan guarantees for construction of new atomic reactors—loans that even the Congressional Budget Office says will have a 50% failure rate.

Support the Musicians! National Call-Congress Day: On Tuesday, October 23, Bonnie Raitt, Jackson Browne, Graham Nash and others are coming to Washington, DC to bring added attention to this issue and to talk to Congressional leaders. Their message will be: no taxpayer bailouts for the nuclear power industry.

We hope you’ll support their efforts by calling your own Congressmembers on Tuesday, October 23, and asking your friends and colleagues to call as well. Let’s keep the halls of Capitol Hill buzzing next Tuesday—with personal visits and thousands of ringing phones!

Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121.

People sometimes ask why we don’t just set up simple ways for you to send an e-mail to your legislators. There are two answers: 1) such systems are actually pretty expensive; 2) more importantly, phone calls are far more effective than e-mails, which mostly go unread in Congressional offices because of the huge volume they receive.

NEW FACT SHEETS: The broad coalition working to stop the loan guarantees has prepared five new fact sheets on various aspects of this issue. They are available on the front page of NIRS’ website, www.nirs.org. Educate yourself, educate your media, educate your Congressmembers.

SIGN-ON LETTER: Below is a sign-on letter prepared by the Sustainable Energy Network. This letter is for ORGANIZATIONS ONLY. If your organization can sign, please send your name, organization, city and state to sustainable-energy-network@hotmail.com by close-of-business October 23. Please do not send to NIRS. Individuals: if you haven’t already, please sign the petition on loan guarantees at www.nukefree.org.


October 24, 2007


PLEASE OPPOSE LOAN GUARANTEES TO THE NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY


Members, U.S. Senate
Members, U.S. House of Representatives
United States Congress
Washington, D.C.

Dear Senator/Representative:

We, the undersigned organizations, businesses, and individual activists, are writing to urge that any energy legislation considered by the 110th Congress not include provisions authorizing or otherwise facilitating loan guarantees for the commercial nuclear power industry.

The Senate-passed energy bill (H.R.6) and the House-passed energy bill
(H.R.3221) both contain sweeping provisions that would dramatically alter the U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program and potentially provide a virtual blank check from taxpayers for the building of many more nuclear power plants. Indeed, the nuclear industry has already indicated that it wants $25 billion in guarantees for 2008, and another $25 billion for 2009, with untold billions more to come after that.

The industry wants these subsidies because after fifty years, atomic power has been rejected by the marketplace. In fact, Wall Street will not independently invest in more of them, and still no private insurance company will underwrite the possibility of a major reactor disaster. This is not surprising given the industry's dubious safety record, high economic costs and overruns, and inability to solve the problem of radioactive waste disposal. Consequently, additional federal funding directed towards the mature nuclear power industry would be both extremely risky and wasteful.

More importantly, nuclear power has been left behind by a revolution in safer, cleaner, and more cost-effective renewable energy and energy efficient technologies. Biofuels, geothermal, solar, water power, and wind have become the world's fastest-growing energy technologies and have positioned themselves as the best solutions to global warming, rising energy costs, and energy imports.

Nuclear reactor loan guarantees therefore would siphon away limited federal dollars better spent on truly competitive sources of power.

Consequently, we ask that any nuclear loan guarantee provisions be removed from any energy bill considered by Congress and that any type of federal energy loan guarantee programs be designed solely to support promising sustainable energy technologies.


Sincerely,



Read More......

10/15/07

Blog Action Day

Blog Action Day
On October 15th, bloggers around the web will unite to put a single important issue on everyone’s mind - the environment. Every blogger will post about the environment in their own way and relating to their own topic. Our aim is to get everyone talking towards a better future.

Blog Action Day is about MASS participation. That means we need you! Here are 3 ways to participate:

Post on your blog relating to the environment on Blog Action Day
Donate your day’s earnings to an environmental charity
Promote Blog Action Day around the web

Read More......

10/8/07

Caldicott and La Duke....speak out




October 07 #1 TVS-Clam Update: Events
Posted by: "Tom Wyatt" tom@tomwyattphoto.com tomwphoto
Sun Oct 7, 2007 9:23 am (PST)

Greetings!
This TVS-Clamshell Alliance news update has
information on upcoming events, a project update will be coming soon.
Below: 1.*Winona LaDuke*, 2. V*ermont Yankee License Renewal*, 3.*Dr.
Helen Caldicott/AFSC*

1. *Winona LaDuke* will be speaking at two New England locations in
the next week. She is is an Ojibwe environmental activist and
founding member of the White Earth Land Recovery Project. Winona
serves as the program director of the Honor the Earth Fund. She
works to advocate, raise public support, and create funding for
native environmental groups. LaDuke is the author of Last Standing
Woman (Voyager Press) and All Our Relations: Native Struggles For
Land And Life (Southend Press). She has spoken at many
anti-nuclear rallies and has written an essay for the upcoming
_*/To The Village Square/*:_*/_ Nukes, Clams and Democracy_
/*book. The first event is *Monday, Oct. 8th, 2007 at 7 p.m.* in
Greenfield Community College's Sloan Theatre. One College Drive,
Greenfield, MA. This is a fundraising event for the The Friends of
Wissatinnewag, Inc. For info on tickets click on:
http://wissatinnewag.org/cgi/fow/news.html The second event is
*Tuesday October 9th at 7 p.m*. at UMass Amherst (Campus Center
Room 101) in Amherst MA, for more info click on:
http://www.umass.edu/umhome/events/articles/64031.php Another
upcoming event: October,17 in Moultonboro NH with the Audubon
Expedition Institute at Lesley University.
2. *Thursday **October 11 *in* Brattleboro**,* *VT - **Public Comment
on Vermont Yankee Renewal Application * Interested citizens will
have an opportunity to comment on issues pending in an Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) proceeding regarding the license
renewal application for the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant,
located in Vernon, Vt. The remarks, which will be transcribed,
will be heard by the three administrative judges handling the
Vermont Yankee adjudicatory proceeding. Known as "limited
appearance statements", the comments will be accepted during two
sessions to be held at the Latchis Theatre, at 50 Main St. in
Brattleboro. (Directions are available on the theatre's web site
at: http://www.latchis.com/location.html .) The first session is
scheduled for 1 to 4 p.m. and the second from 6:30 to 10:30 p.m.
The comments are supposed to focus on 3 contentions filed by The
New England Coalition (NEC) related to the aging of the reactor.
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., which owns and operates Vermont
Yankee, applied to the NRC for a 20-year license extension for the
plant (current license due to expire March 21, 2012). In August
the plant had a _cooling tower collapse and was forced to an
emergency shut down_ due to faulty valve. Legislators from Vermont
and surrounding states have been calling for an independent safety
assessment of the plant. Citizens Awareness Network (CAN) have
been able to get on stage in the previous hearings. Let's pack the
hall, bring your signs, there maybe opportunities for street
theatre. CAN, NEC and others will also hold a rally at Pliny Park
in Brattleboro, VT from 6-7pm on October 11th.
3. *On **Sunday, October 14 from 3 to 6 PM *the *American Friends
Service Committee* will celebrate grassroots activism at their
annual fall event, at the Concord Unitarian Universalist Church,
in Concord NH. Renowned anti-nuclear activist *Dr. Helen
Caldicott* will be speaking and there will be music with Susie
Burke and David Surette. Volunteers will be preparing dinner,
with many dishes prepared from locally grown produce. Suggested
donation for the event is $15. AFSC supporters have donated some
wonderful objects and services that will be featured in a silent
auction at the event. You can view them on-line, at
www.afsc.org/nhauction . You can
also submit bids by sending an email to David Blair, at
orionblair@gmail.com . Please make
sure you tell David which item you are bidding on as well as the
size of your bid. The October 14 event will also be a local
celebration of the AFSC's 90^th anniversary. The Service
Committee has had such a profound impact over the decades because
of supporters like you, who care about social justice and peace,
and who know that active nonviolence can be a powerful resource
for change. You can call Arnie Alpert at 603-224-2407 or send him
an email at aalpert@afsc.org to let him
know if you are coming.
4. For the latest anti-nuclear news please go to:
http://clamshell-tvs.blogspot.com/

Other good news sources include:
http://www.beyondnuclear.org/news.html
http://www.nukebusters.org/
http://www.ratepayersrights.org/




Read More......

10/4/07

FACTS ON NUCLEAR ENERGY


FACTS ON NUCLEAR ENERGY
The international poster campaign of IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War), EUROSOLAR (European Association for Renewable Energy) and WISE International (World Information Service on Nuclear Energy) shows how untenable the industry’s prophecies are. 8 posters use concise arguments that succinctly illustrate why.

Read More......

10/3/07

NEW REACTORS IN SOUTH TEXAS


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Michael Mariotte, Executive Director
September 25, 2007 301-270-6477; 301-395-7463 (cell)


NEW REACTORS IN SOUTH TEXAS WOULD SET U.S. ENERGY POLICY ON MISGUIDED COURSE

Today, NRG Energy said it is submitting an application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to build two new reactors at its South Texas nuclear site. This is the first full application for a new reactor in the U.S. in more than 30 years.

This project is emblematic of the failures of U.S. energy policy to effectively meet the needs of our nation. Nuclear power is a 20th century technology in a new world of climate crisis and a future that demands a distributed, sustainable approach to energy. Nuclear power requires massive taxpayer subsidies and yet still cannot compete environmentally with the sustainable energy technologies that will power our future.

NRG Energy already has been quoted in the media (Washington Post, September 25, 2007) as saying that “the whole reason” the company is considering new nuclear reactors is taxpayer subsidies provided by Congress and the Bush Administration in the 2005 Energy Policy Act. These multi-billion dollar subsidies include taxpayer loan guarantees for new reactors, tax credits for the first six reactors built, the Price-Anderson Act limitation of utility liability for nuclear accidents, and “risk insurance” to cover possible delays in the licensing process.

Without taxpayer support, no utility would build a new atomic reactor, and no financial institution would invest in a new reactor.

Moreover, the NRG Energy application would repeat one of the fundamental mistakes of the first generation of nuclear power: the construction of nuclear reactors without a feasible facility or plan for storage of the lethal radioactive waste the reactor would produce. The Yucca Mountain, Nevada, radioactive waste dump is on its last legs, and appears increasingly unlikely to ever open. Even if it did, a new round of nuclear construction would necessitate construction of another radioactive waste dump as well—something no state in the country likely would accept. After 50 years, one would think the lesson would have been learned: building atomic reactors without a scientifically-sound waste plan is folly.

Texas is blessed with enormous potential for wind and solar power, while aggressive energy efficiency programs remain the cheapest, fastest and cleanest method of addressing both electricity demand and the need to quickly reduce carbon emissions. Construction of new reactors in Texas would divert the resources needed to implement those efficiency programs and help solar and wind reach their full potential—to the detriment of Texans and all Americans. A recent study from American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (summarized at http://www.nirs.org/alternatives/sestudy10.pdf) shows that Texas can meet all forecasted energy demand through energy efficiency and sustainable energy technologies.

Both Texas and the United States deserve better than a greedy utility feasting at the taxpayer trough to build another large polluting power plant. We expect Texans to oppose the NRG Energy project, and we expect to help Texans with their opposition.




Read More......

9/19/07

No War, No Warming, Rise Up! October 22

Ted Glick | No War, No Warming, Rise Up!: "The options before us are crystal clear. Down one road, the one we're now on, lies a cascading series of oil and water wars, climate disasters and ecological devastation. Down the other lies a turn toward peaceful resolution of conflicts, energy conservation, efficiency and a clean energy revolution, and social and economic justice."

Read More......

9/18/07

INDIAN POINT...meets the people and The NRC


Riverkeeper Needs YOU – on Wednesday, September 19!

If you are concerned about Indian Point’s impacts on our River and environment, you need to attend the most important public meeting in recent history!

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is holding the second public meeting on Entergy’s application for 20-year license extension for Indian Point.

It will take place on Wednesday, September 19 at The Colonial Terrace in Cortlandt Manor with two identical sessions from 1:30-4:30pm and from 7-10pm. This is the public’s opportunity to raise concerns about twenty more years of Indian Point’s fishkills, thermal pollution, radioactive leaks, and public health risks. All comments MUST be addressed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be issued next year.

Riverkeeper will be testifying on behalf of its members – but each person’s voice is important in our democracy. Riverkeeper will provide talking points on our key concerns at the meeting.
The Colonial Terrace is located at 119 Oregon Road in Cortlandt Manor, NY. (914) 737-0400



Read More......

9/17/07

The Sept 19th Indian Point Public Meeting


The Sept 19th Indian Point Public Meeting - Focus

The NRC’s focus in relicensing of Indian Point for an additional 20 years

What the NRC deems “in scope” for relicensing Indian Point for another 20 years are safety issues related to the effects of aging on safety-related components and structures; however the NRC interprets the concept of safety-related extremely narrowly. Also in scope – and the focus of the September 19th meeting – are environmental considerations related to a 20 extension. These include:

Wildlife and Fish
Water and Air Resources
Historic or Cultural Resources
Taxes, Community Development
Environmental Justice
Land Use
Human Health


Basically, the NRC has designed rules to skew the process so as to allow the rubberstamping of relicensing applications. In fact the NRC has never denied any plant a new license. Under this regulatory schema:

The NRC will NOT consider the effect a major accident at Indian Point would have on the 300,000 people living within 10 miles, the nearly 1 million living within 20 miles, or the 21 million people living within 50 miles of the plant.

The NRC will NOT consider the location of Indian Point according to current siting standards.

The NRC will NOT look at the region’s actual emergency response capability, or the capacity of the local congested roadways to handle a mass evacuation, or the feasibility of truly protective sheltering for those unable to evacuate in time. (The sole independent expert assessment made of the Indian Point emergency plan – the Witt Report – spent over 500 pages detailing the flaws of the NRC/FEMA plan.)

The NRC will NOT factor in the health risks associated with living near Indian Point.

The NRC will NOT consider the fact that Indian Point is operated under a LLC structure, and that its $10 billion corporate parent, the Entergy Corporation, elected to let its New Orleans LLC subsidiary go bankrupt after Katrina rather than lend it the money needed for repairs.

The NRC will NOT consider Indian Point’s vulnerability to terrorist attack or the unique terrorist risks associated with a nuclear plant 24 miles from NYC. (Mohamed Atta, the hijacker who piloted the plane that struck the North Tower, considered redirecting the strike to the nuclear plant on the Hudson, according to 9/11 Commission investigation findings.)

The NRC will NOT consider the manner in which high level nuclear waste (also known as spent fuel) is maintained on site, or the fact that – to date – there exists no national depository that has been opened to accept nuclear waste from commercial reactors.

The NRC will NOT consider that, even if Yucca Mountain finally opens up, if Indian Point is relicensed for 20 more years, there will be no space at Yucca Mountain for all of the plant’s additional decades of nuclear waste to go.

The NRC will NOT take into account the numerous long-term hazards associated with high-level nuclear waste that will be stored on site, and will remain deadly for literally thousands of years.

And, unbelievably, the NRC will NOT even consider the overall safety and security track record of Indian Point’s operation.

Moreover, a few years ago, the NRC also changed its rules to cut out the public from meaningful participation in the relicensing process by eliminating the right of intervenors to (1) have public on-the-record hearings with sworn testimony; (2) to present expert witnesses to challenge the assertions of plant operators/NRC; and (3) to cross-examine witnesses of plant operators/NRC. Instead, we get meetings, where the NRC very nicely answers questions, but has absolutely no real accountability.

Notwithstanding, the NRC may have finally met its match in the Indian Point arena. The Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition is and the entire Lower Hudson Valley NY Congressional delegation are opposed to this creaky machine being allowed to continue leaking and puffing out its radionuclides into the environment. It’s REALLY important to make a strong public showing on September 19th, so do come if your can - and drag along a few friends!
The meeting will be held at the Colonial Terrace, located at 119 Oregon Road in Cortlandt Manor, NY. (914) 737-0400. IPSEC will be posting directions.
Michel

Michel Lee, Esq.
Steering Committee
Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition

(914) 420-5624
ciecplee@verizon.net





Read More......

9/14/07

Support for the Ardoch Algonquin Blockade of FVC Uranium Mining Site


NEWS FROM NIRS
nirsnet@nirs.org; www.nirs.org

For Immediate Release Contact: Donald Keesing
September 14, 2007 301-270-6477

81 Organizations Sign Statement of Support for the Ardoch Algonquin Blockade of FVC Uranium Mining Site on Algonquin Territory in Ontario, Canada


Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Greenpeace Canada, Mining Watch Canada, Voices Opposed to Environmental Racism and dozens of other organizations sent a statement of support for the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation’s blockade of sites on territory staked out by Frontenac Ventures Corporation for uranium mining. Aboriginal and jurisdictional title to the land is held by the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation. The statement was sent to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Minister of Indian Affairs Chuck Strahl, Ontario Premier, Dalton McGuinty and Ontario Minister of Aboriginal Affairs David Ramsey.

The statement was signed by 81 organizations from 12 different countries and 107 individuals, including members of 11 First Nations or Native American Tribes. These included notables such as musician/activists Bonnie Raitt and Graham Nash, and Ojibwe activist Winona LaDuke.

Since June 28, 2007 members of the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation, other First Nations and their supporters have been conducting a brave nonviolent direct action by occupying a staging site for uranium exploration. 30,000 acres have been staked out for uranium exploration at Sharbot Lake in Algonquin territory.

The mining company filed a $77 million suit against the First Nations seeking a court order for their removal. In response an injunction was issued by the Ontario Supreme Court ordering the First Nations and their supporters to evacuate the property and making them subject to arrest for failing to obey the order.

The Ontario Provincial Police thus far have remained reluctant to exacerbate the situation, and have not enforced the order. There is a provincial election on October 10, 2007. Greenpeace Canada Executive Director Bruce Cox said, “Uranium mining and the McGuinty government’s $40 billion dollar nuclear power program need to be key issues… in the election.”

Co-chief Paula Sherman of the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation said, “Our opposition to uranium exploration and mining is based on health concerns as well as our inherent responsibility to protect the land.” Said Dave Martin, energy coordinator of Greenpeace Canada, “Past uranium mining in Ontario left a deadly legacy of 200 million tons of toxic tailings in the Elliott Lake and Bancroft areas. Ontario uranium should be left in the ground. There are too many environmental, safety and economic reasons to oppose both uranium mining and nuclear power.”

“We are calling for Premier McGuinty to enact an immediate moratorium on uranium exploration and mining for Ontario, following the existing precedent in Nova Scotia,” said John Kittle, spokesperson for the Community Coalition Against Mining Uranium.

Joan Kuyek from Mining Watch Canada said "Ontario has to learn to respect the rights of Aboriginal people to protect their lands and resources; the Algonquins provide a model for us all."

For more info contact:

Co-Chief Joan Sherman, Ardoch Algonquin First Nation
omamikwe@bell.blackberry.net 613-279-1327
http://www.aafna.ca/

Dave Martin, Energy Coordinator, Greenpeace Canada
dave.martin@yto.greenpeace.org 416-597-8408 x3050
http://www.greenpeace.org/canada/

Joan Kuyek, National Coordinator, Mining Watch Canada
joan@miningwatch.ca 613-569-3439
http://www.miningwatch.ca




Read More......